Przeglądaj wg Autor "Chaves, Fabiola"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 4 z 4
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 2 (12), 2010
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2010) Matte, James Allan; Shurany, Tuvia; Chaves, Fabiola; Leśniak, Marek; Zubańska, Magdalena; Mirska, Natalia; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 2 (24), 2013
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2013) Bachhiesl, Christian; Shurany, Tuvia; Chaves, Fabiola; Stempkowski, Monika; Matte, James Allan; Domin-Kuźma, Agnieszka; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Testing a Deaf Mute Examinee in Costa Rica
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2013) Shurany, Tuvia; Chaves, Fabiola
    "In March 2013, a good friend and client in Costa Rica contacted the first author (Shurany) and told him that he had heard some rumors that two of his employees were involved in theft from his company and one of them was a deaf-mute who had been employed at the company for many years, hence the employer did not want to take action against that employee without being sure of his guilt. Additional information indicated that the subject reads lips, knows sign language and can read and write. None of the examiners had any knowledge of sign language, so this option was not available."(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    The Integrated Zone Comparison Technique and ASIT PolySuite Algorithm: A Field Validity Study
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2010) Shurany, Tuvia; Chaves, Fabiola
    This field study tested the validity of the Integrated Zone Comparison Technique (IZCT) designed for specific issue testing and the ASIT PolySuite Algorithm for data analysis in a private commercial environment between April and December, 2009, at the G4S polygraph unit in Costa Rica. During this time period 27 cases were chosen to be tested with the IZCT. Out of these 27 cases, 21 were solved by confession. The 27 cases had a total of 113 suspects. Out of the 113 tests, 84 were confirmed results. Of these, there were 44 confirmed deceptive examinees and 40 confirmed innocent examinees. Data analysis was performed with the Academy for Scientific Investigative Training’s ASIT PolySuite©, which is an examiner-controlled computerized algorithm, using the Horizontal Scoring System (HSS), as well as an experienced examiners analysis using a 3-Point Scale . IZCT, using ASIT PolySuite, had an overall accuracy of 92.9% with Inconclusives, and 98.73% accuracy excluding them. Manual 3-point scoring had an overall accuracy of 91.7% with Inconclusives, and 98.71% excluding them.