Przeglądaj wg Autor "Stein, Einat"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 4 z 4
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    A Field Study on the Validity of the Quadri-track Zone Comparison Technique
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2009) Shurany, Tuvia; Stein, Einat; Brand, Eytan
    "This field study is the third published piece of field research on the validity of the Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique. The Quadri-Track ZCT was initially developed in 1977 by James Allan Matte as a result of field experiments designed to resolve the problem of false positives in psychophysiological veracity (PV) examinations using the polygraph. Its theory and methodology were published in the American Polygraph Association’s journal Polygraph in December 1978 and in several textbooks (Matte 1980, 1996, 2000 and 2002)."(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 1 (7), 2009
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2009) Shurany, Tuvia; Stein, Einat; Brand, Eytan; Saldžiūnas, Vitas; Kovalenko, Aleksandras; Soshnikov, Aleksandr P.; Pietruszka, Jarosław; Konieczny, Jerzy; Widacki, Jan; Jaworski, Ryszard; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 3-4 (9-10), 2009
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2009) Pollina, Dean A.; Horvath, Frank; Denver, John W.; Dollins, Andrew B.; Brown, Troy E.; Shurany, Tuvia; Matte, James Allan; Stein, Einat; Zanev, Svetoslav; Saldžiūnas, Vitas; Kovalenko, Aleksandras; Gaidarov, Kalin; Lewandowski, Edward; Lewandowski, Łukasz; Wrońska, Małgorzata; Konieczny, Jerzy; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Influence of case facts on blind scorers of polygraph tests
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2009) Shurany, Tuvia; Matte, James Allan; Stein, Einat
    "The first author (Shurany) was asked by a client if the Quality Control Reviewer should be provided with the facts of the case before blind scoring the physiological data recorded on the polygraph charts related to that polygraph examination, and whether it would have an influence on the reviewer’s judgment and evaluation. Th e question generated this research study, which was preceded by a fi eld study by Dror & Rosenthal (2008) that employed meta-analytic procedures to determine the degree of reliability and bias ability of forensic experts."(...)