Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "Backster Zone Comparison Technique"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    A Field Study of the Backster Zone Comparison Technique's Either-Or Rule and Scoring System Versus Two Other Scoring Systems When Relevant Question Elicits Strong Response
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2010) Matte, James Allan
    "In March 1974, Cleve Backster authored an article published in Polygraph entitled “Anticlimax Dampening Concept” (Backster 1974). In his article, Backster states “The anticlimax dampening concept is formulated on the well-validated psychological principle that a person’s fears, anxieties, and apprehensions are channeled toward the situation which holds greatest immediate threat to his self-preservation or general well-being. "(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 2 (12), 2010
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2010) Matte, James Allan; Shurany, Tuvia; Chaves, Fabiola; Leśniak, Marek; Zubańska, Magdalena; Mirska, Natalia; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Setting the Record Concerning the Differences Between the Matte Quadri-Track and the Backster Zone Comparison Techniques
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2018) Matte, James Allan
    "There has been some question within the polygraph community regarding whether the Matte Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique with its innovative changes were original or merely a copy of the Backster Zone Comparison Technique from which the MQTZCT emanated. The published documents provided herein, clearly show that the MQTZCT reduced the Truth Cut-Off scores in its conclusion table six years before the Backster ZCT implemented its Truth Cut-Off score reduction. Th e MQTZCT also retained the value of the Cut-Off scores in each chart, rather than diminish their value with each chart as in the Backster ZCT. Furthermore, it also ameliorated Backster’s “Either-Or” Rule, with the Matte “Dual Equal Strong Reaction” Rule, effectively inhibiting the successful use of countermeasures. Th e MQTZCT introduced the Fear of Error Control Question for comparison with the Hope of Error Relevant Question as a means of addressing the Othello Error (Ekman Dec. 1986). Th e MQTZCT used the Stimulation Test in conjunction with the MQTZCT, contrary to Backster’s rejection and non-use. Th e MQTZCT also eliminated Backster’s superfl uous question regarding prior polygraph tests, and subsequently also eliminated Backster’s drug question."(...)