Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "Event Knowledge Test"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Problems of Questions in Event Knowledge Tests
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2009) Saldžiūnas, Vitas; Kovalenko, Aleksandras
    "When reviewing application possibilities of event knowledge tests (GKT, CIT, EKT), all authors (Abrams, 1989; Ben-Shakhar and Elaad, 2002; Krzyscin, 1998; Lykken, 1981; Matte, 1997; Nakayama, 2002; Soshnikov et al., 2008) state that the application of event knowledge tests is limited due to the following: 1. It is difficult to formulate a sufficient number of relevant questions; 2. The number of questions reduces because the information about the details of an event is publicised in the media and sometimes it is made public by incompetent criminal police investigators or prosecutors."(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Search for New Tests
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2012) Saldžiūnas, Vitas; Kovalenko, Aleksandras
    "Widely known sources (Mangan, Armitage, Adams, 2008; Matte, 2012; Raskin & Honts, 2002; Shurany & Chaves, 2010) state that minimum 90% criterion accuracy may be achieved when using Control Question Tests (CQT) in polygraph examinations. Such results can probably only be achieved by polygraphist- superstars. However, we will not perform an analysis of the reasons thereof in this article."(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    The Event Knowledge Test (EKT)
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2008) Saldžiūnas, Vitas; Kovalenko, Aleksandr
    "In Lithuania polygraphs have been in use since 1992. Tests that are based on a comparison-relevant question system are not popular. The results of psychophysiological tests and their conclusions are difficult to prove in courts. The results of tests have almost no use to the police and prosecutor’s department in pre-trial investigation. Those results in criminal investigations that were evaluated highest in court decisions were achieved using an event knowledge test (EKT). "(...)