Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "criminal procedure"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 6 z 6
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Conditions and Requirements of Polygraph Examination
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2012) Budaházi, Árpád
    "The establishment of the honesty or dishonesty of a person giving testimony inflicts constant dilemmas on authorities participating in criminal procedures. The concerned authorities must continuously examine the trustworthiness of the accused and the witnesses so that the court shall not have to face the possibility, before making their decision, that some of the available evidence is “poor” or “fake” (Tremmel, 2006) as the testimonies given by the accused and the witness failed to stand up to examination. It is necessary to check the credibility of testimonies not only in the judicial procedure but also during the investigation phase, according to the recommendations of criminal tactics."(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 2 (24), 2013
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2013) Bachhiesl, Christian; Shurany, Tuvia; Chaves, Fabiola; Stempkowski, Monika; Matte, James Allan; Domin-Kuźma, Agnieszka; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 4 (26), 2013
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2013) Widacki, Jan; Matte, James Allan; Huszcza, Martyna; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Polygraph in Austria
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2013) Stempkowski, Monika
    "The legal classification of polygraph use in Austrian criminal courts was established almost 50 years ago. It was based on the permanent judiciary practice of the Supreme Court from the 1960s on – that the use of polygraphs during any part of a criminal procedure is not allowed. This article will provide a short review of this practice of the Supreme Court, followed by a discussion on the positions taken in the literature as well as general dogmatic considerations about the rules laid out in the Austrian code of criminal procedure."(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały nr 1, 2015
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2015) Widacki, Jan; Rab, Henriett; Bagan-Kurluta, Katarzyna; Szabó, Krisztián; Więzowska-Czepiel, Beata; Bogoslavets, Volodymyr; Rosiak, Piotr; Curzydło, Anita; Kula, Lilla; Bernat, Rafał; Baran, Agnieszka; Swaldek, Michał; Kołodziejczyk, Łukasz; Stosur, Arkadiusz; Jasińska, Katarzyna; Jabłońska, Elżbieta; Maciąg, Zbigniew
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    The mandatory presence of the Public Prosecutor’s Office at the hearing of the criminal investigation in face of the new law of the anticrime package and the need for revision of brazilian jurisprudence – prohibition of ex officio production of evidence by the magistrate
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2022) Maior de Almeida, Rosemary Souto; Aureliano da Silva, Müller
    Brazil has been going through a great change in its Legislative scenario, bringing several incorporations in the fields of law where the validity of Law n. Law no. 13,964/19 brought changes to the Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure and Criminal Execution Law. The Brazilian Criminal Procedure is governed by the Accusatory System and, through this article, we sought to better analyze an application of the aforementioned Law as a way to ratify the system adopted in the Brazilian criminal procedure, the accusatory, as well as to bring the view of the need for readjustment, by the Brazilian courts, with regard to the production of evidence by the Magistrate without the participation of the representative of the Public Ministry in the criminal instruction hearings, thus corroborating the understanding that the participation of the Members of the Public Ministry in the hearings is essential. This systematic study sought a brief improvement in the systems that govern criminal proceedings, as well as focusing on the application of the sources of Law within criminal proceedings, with the Law being the immediate source and, as such, it should take precedence over the sources secondary, such as jurisprudence, for example, make it clear that the Public Prosecutor’s Office is an essential body to the provision of jurisdiction, acting in a plicit manner, that is, acting not only as an Accuser in Criminal Actions, but also as an inspector of the body of law in any action that intervenes, including public.