Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "lie detection"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 11 z 11
Wyników na stronę
Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Essentials of the Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) Strength: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Comparison Question Test (CQT)(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2019) Ginton, AvitalThe essentials of the Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) theoretical framework for explaining the Comparison Question Test (CQT) (Ginton, 2009), is presented here in a detailed outline format. It is based on the notion that examinees who lie on the test in the relevant questions are attached psychologically to the relevant issue in a diff erent way than the truth-tellers. An essential diff erence is the strength by which the suspect’s attention is directed, focused, and bound to the relevant issue. Th ese aspects of attention in the context of polygraph examinations are coined, Relevant Issue Gravity (RIG) Strength. Th e RIG strength is assumed to distribute diff erently between the liars and the truth-tellers. Th ere is reason to believe that liars hold a stronger RIG compared to the truthful subjects, and eventually, that affects the differential reactivity to the relevant vs. comparison questions. Th e following describes the rationale behind the RIG concept, some supporting data, and the theoretical as well as practical implications.Pozycja European Polygraph 2024, Volume 18, Number 2 (60)(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM Uniwersytetu Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego w Krakowie, 2024) Amsel, Tuvya T.; Kraujalis, Laimutis; Widacki, MichałPozycja European Polygraph 2025, Volume 19, Number 1 (61)(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM Uniwersytetu Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego w Krakowie, 2025) Shapovalov, Vitalii; Widacki, Jan; Widacki, Michał; Wójcik, Bartosz; Szuba-Boroń, Anna; Celniak, Weronika; Słapczyńska, Dominika; Krishnan, Gowthami; Augustyniak; Piotr; Amsel; Tuvya T.; Floren, ThorstenPozycja European Polygraph no. 2 (36), 2016(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2016) Aleskovskiy, Sergey; Shurany, Tuvia; Tarabuła, Marcin; Widacki, Michał; Szuba-Boroń, Anna; Gołaszewski, Marcin; Widacki, Jan; Widacki, JanPozycja European Polygraph no. 4 (38), 2016(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2016) Amsel, Tuvya T.; Kircher, John C.; Raskin, David C.; Shapovalov, Vitaliy; Widacki, JanPozycja European Polygraph nr 1 (31), 2015(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2015) Gołaszewski, Marcin; Zając, Paweł; Widacki, Jan; Jaworski, Ryszard; Leśniak, Marek; Widacki, JanPozycja European Polygraph nr 2 (32), 2015(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2015) Saldžiūnas, Vitas; Kovalenko, Aleksandras; Gordon, Nathan J.; Matte, James Allan; Nelson, Raymond; Widacki, Jan; Widacki, JanPozycja European Polygraph nr 3 (33), 2015(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2015) Shurany, Tuvia; Jaworski, Ryszard; Widacki, Jan; Szuba-Boroń, Anna; Widacki, JanPozycja European Polygraph nr 4 (34), 2015(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2015) Krapohl, Donald J.; Goodson, Walt; Widacki, Jan; Dukała, Karolina; Widacki, JanPozycja Polygraph Examination in Lithuania: History, Legal Framework, and Practice(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM Uniwersytetu Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego w Krakowie, 2024) Kraujalis, LaimutisPolygraph has had more than 30 years of extensive history in Lithuania. This paper offers an overview rather than in-depth research into how polygraph developed in Lithuania in last three decades. There are similar articles about legal and practical aspects of using polygraph in Lithuania published in Lithuanian, with one of them having been published in European Polygraph in 2007 (Kraujalis et al 2007) nevertheless, the author evaluates current situation of the polygraph in Lithuania.Pozycja “Soviet polygraph”: metamorphoses and historical facts(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM Uniwersytetu Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego w Krakowie, 2025) Shapovalov, VitaliiThis article explores the historical development of polygraphy in the Soviet Union, with particular attention to the activities of KGB’s Laboratory No. 30. Drawing on declassified materials, eyewitness accounts, and professional reflections by former KGB personnel, the study reconstructs the evolution of Soviet polygraph practices from the late 1960s to the 1980s. It examines early scientific contributions, the influence of American methodologies, the adaptation of foreign technologies, and the creation of Soviet testing procedures such as the Mixed-Type Test. The article also highlights how Soviet ideological constraints shaped both the official discourse and cinematic portrayals of polygraphy. Special attention is given to the field practices of Laboratory No. 30, including unconventional assignments related to paranormal phenomena. The study concludes that, despite efforts to replicate or adapt Western polygraph techniques, Soviet developments did not result in uniquely innovative methods or technologies. These findings provide a contextual foundation for understanding contemporary polygraph practices in the post-Soviet space, particularly in Ukraine and russia.