Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "pokrzywdzony"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 5 z 5
Wyników na stronę
Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Dochodzenie roszczeń cywilnych przez pokrzywdzonego przestępstwem od świadka koronnego(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2018) Ciszek-Łudzik, IzabelaThe aim of the article is to discuss the issue of the state’s evidence institution, in particular to present civil law issues related to pursuit of civil claims by a crime victim. In connection with the rapid development of crime that can be observed in recent years, a solution that would effectively combat this phenomenon needed to be found. By the Act of June 25, 1997, the State’s Evidence Act was passed; the Act introduced a solution granting a prize in the form of not being liable to punishment for committed crimes in exchange for help in disclosing the circumstances of the offenses the state’s evidence has been aware of. The legislator, granting the state’s evidence immunity against punishment, forgot to secure the victim’s interest in the pursuit of civil claims resulting from the committed crime. A victim is basically deprived of the real possibility of pursuing civil claims from the state’s evidence. The obligation set in art. 3 par. 1 item 1 point b of the State’s Evidence Act introduced by the Act of July 22, 2006 shall be regarded as a positive solution that equalizes the chances of the weakened party, that is the victim. This regulation conditions granting of the immunity of the state’s evidence upon obligatory disclosure by the state’s evidence of their property and the property of other offenders referred to in art. 1 of the State’s Evidence Act. The article presents the position of a victim and their real chances of recovering the damage caused by the criminal group. A victim may pursue their civil claims directly from the state’s evidence, which is virtually impossible, due to the protection of personal data that is the state secret. A victim may also pursue their civil claims from other accomplices of the offense who, in the event of adjudicating the obligation to repair the damage caused, have a recourse claim against the state’s evidence.Pozycja Gmina jako pokrzywdzony w świetle art. 49 kpk(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2006) Lewandowska-Malec, Izabela"Zgodnie z art. 49 kpk, pokrzywdzonym jest osoba fizyczna lub prawna, której dobro prawne zostało bezpośrednio naruszone lub zagrożone przez przestępstwo. Mimo braku osobowości prawnej pokrzywdzonym może być także instytucja państwowa, samorządowa lub społeczna. Gmina, w świetle obowiązującego prawa, posiada osobowość prawną. Przesądza o tym Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w art. 165 § 1: Jednostki samorządu terytorialnego mają osobowość prawną. Zapis ten powtarza także art. 2 ust. 2 ustawy z 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie gminnym"(...)Pozycja Kilka uwag o ustawowej definicji pokrzywdzonego na tle art. 233 kk - zagadnienia materialnoprawne i karnoprocesowe(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2012) Irlik, KamilaAs defined in law, the aggrieved party is a natural or legal person whose legally protected right was directly infringed or jeopardised. Decisive for the injury is the immediacy of the legally protected right infringed or jeopardised with the offence. The status of the aggrieved party may be enjoyed also by a state, local authority, or civic institution, even when it has no legal personality. The definition of the aggrieved party is based on premises from the realm of substantive criminal law, yet it is also a procedural notion, as resulting from it are a number of procedural powers. In turn, what is protected against crime or offence stated in the definition of article 233 of the Criminal Code is the correct operation of the Polish judiciary, i.e. an extensive range of institutions that execute law and the credibility of the decisions made in the proceedings envisaged on the power of the act.Pozycja Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały nr 1 (22), 2018(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2018) Augustyniak, Monika; Rab, Henriett; Zaccaria, Márton Leó; Srogosz, Tomasz; Szpak, Agnieszka; Peno, Michał; Tyburcy, Tomasz; Kania, Agnieszka; Burdziak, Konrad; Jurewicz, Marcin; Biernat, Jakub; Więzowska-Czepiel, Beata; Grześkowiak, Aleksandra; Ciszek-Łudzik, Izabela; Schmidt, Maciej; Surdyk, Michał; Zwolak, Sławomir; Borkowski, Robert; Mirocha, Łukasz; Marek, Paweł; Maciąg, ZbigniewPozycja Studia Prawnicze: rozprawy i materiały nr 2, 2012(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2012) Kubiak, Hieronim; Biernat, Tadeusz; Zamuliński, Filip; Noworyta, Rafał; Pawlik, Renata; Irlik, Kamila; Radwaniak, Krzysztof; Gołaszewski, Marcin; Gajek, Krzysztof; Kolaszyński, Mateusz; Sztompka, Piotr; Widacki, Jan