Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "polygraph chart evaluation"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    European Polygraph nr 2 (44), 2018
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2018) Amsel, Tuvya T.; Shurany, Tuvia; Gordon, Nathan J.; Widacki, Jan; Widacki, Jan
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Indiosyncrasies in Chart Evaluation
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2018) Shurany, Tuvia; Gordon, Nathan J.
    "In the 1970’s and 1980’s, when the authors attended an American Polygraph Association accredited polygraph schools they were taught that the following 33 changes were reaction criteria:"(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    The Connection between Score Threshold, Rate of Inconclusives and Minimum Number of Charts Required for Decision of Truth or Deception
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2013) Matte, James Allan
    "A comprehensive study on Validity and Reliability of Detection of Deception conducted by D.C. Raskin, G.H. Barland, and J.A. Podlesny (1978) for the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice that included fi eld studies and laboratory experiments concluded that the optimal score threshold using the Utah Zone Comparison Technique format was a fixed threshold of +/-6 which would result in an accuracy rate from 88 to 90 percent with an inconclusive rate of approximately 9 percent. Further, the study shows that as the scores increase, there is a moderate increase in accuracy reaching approximately 98 percent, particularly from +/-9 to +/-12, but at the expense of an increase in inconclusives. Furthermore, in the Matte, Reuss 1989a fi eld study, tables 10a1, 10a2, 10b1, 10b2 and 10c show that as the scores increase the probability of error decreases, hence an increase in accuracy. "(...)