Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "polygraph examination as evidence"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 4 z 4
Wyników na stronę
Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Does the Law Circumvent Justice from Being Served?(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2018) Amsel, Tuvya T."Law – a binding custom or practice of a community: a rule of conduct or action prescribed […] or formally recognized as binding […] enforced by a controlling authority […]. Th e courts exist to uphold, interpret, and apply the law [1]. Justice – the legal system that a country uses in order to deal with people who break the law […] the administration of law according to prescribed and accepted principles [2]. In accordance with these defi nitions the Courts’ objective (judges, jurors or tribunals) is to determine whether or not the defendant who stands for trial has committed the offense s/he is accused of. In order to render their decision, courts practically travel back in time and re-construct and re-vive the occurrence surrounding the off ense in order to establish the defendant where about and actions. In other words in order to serve justice the court has to be fully aware of the case facts i.e. the “factual truth” in order to be convinced “beyond any shadow of a doubt” that the defendant has committed the off ense s/he is accused of."(...)Pozycja European Polygraph nr 2 (44), 2018(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2018) Amsel, Tuvya T.; Shurany, Tuvia; Gordon, Nathan J.; Widacki, Jan; Widacki, JanPozycja European Polygraph nr 3 (29), 2014(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2014) Konieczny, Jerzy; Wojciechowski, Bartosz Wojciech; Horvath, Frank; Widacki, Jan; Szuba-Boroń, Anna; Widacki, JanPozycja Polygraph examination in analysis of evidence(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2014) Konieczny, Jerzy"I assume that a polygraph examination may be part of mass of evidence in a specific case, and I also assume that the result of a polygraph examination belongs to forensic evidence, and within it has its place in expert evidence. Therefore, as item of evidence, it can be subjected to an analysis covering the assessment of its credibility, reliability, weigh, probative force, etc., and can also be analysed as evidential argument. Such an argument may be evaluated from two points of view: “internal” developed by its creator (in this case: by the expert), and “external” whose author is the analyst, or, more generally speaking, the addressee of the argument. Th e “internal” analysis is presented in (Ibek 2011). Th is article, in turn, aims at presenting the characteristic features of a polygraph examination result as argument in analysis of evidence."(...)