Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "trade war"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 3 z 3
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe 2020, nr 1 (XVII), Świat – Europa – Niemcy. Historyczne i współczesne problemy stosunków międzynarodowych. Część 1: Świat
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2020) Molo, Beata; Paterek, Anna; Lasoń, Marcin; Czarny, Ryszard M.; Kraj, Kazimierz; Banach, Marian; Czajkowski, Marek; Mickiewicz, Piotr; Żukrowska, Katarzyna; Kwieciński, Rafał; Czornik, Katarzyna; Adamczyk, Natalia; Młynarski, Tomasz; Bonusiak, Grzegorz; Diawoł-Sitko, Anna; Majchrowska, Elżbieta; Bonusiak, Andrzej; Ludwikowski, Rett R.
    Z wprowadzenia: "Drodzy czytelnicy, oddajemy w Wasze ręce szczególny numer „Krakowskich Studiów Międzynarodowych”. Jeszcze na początku 2020 r. planowano, że będzie on zawierał szereg artykułów naukowych nawiązujących do referatów, które miały być wygłoszone na międzynarodowej konferencji naukowej zorganizowanej z okazji 50-lecia pracy naukowo-dydaktycznej prof. dr. hab. Erharda Cziomera. Niestety ten pełen wielu trudnych doświadczeń rok przyniósł ze sobą jedno wydarzenie, które szczególnie silnie odczuła społeczność akademicka Krakowskiej Akademii im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego, Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie i wielu innych uczelni zarówno w Polsce, jak i w Niemczech. Śmierć prof. Cziomera oznacza wielką stratę dla nauki polskiej i niemieckiej, zwłaszcza dla stosunków międzynarodowych i nauk o polityce, a także dla jego rodziny, przyjaciół, współpracowników i studentów. Profesor pozostawił po sobie lukę, którą trudno będzie wypełnić."(...)
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    The U.S. Economic War under the Donald Trump Administration
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2023) Furgacz, Przemysław
    Though the use of economic war for realization of U.S. policy goals has a long history, it seems that the former U.S. president Donald Trump was definitely inclined to resort to this instrument of foreign policy more often and on bigger scale than his predecessors. The economic war appeared to be the favourite foreign policy tool of the Donald Trump. The Trump presidential administration clearly preferred economic over conventional war. The White House under the Trump was determined to withdraw its military involvement in the Middle East and other regions of the globe replacing it with severe economic pressure on its opponents and adversaries. The tools of economic war – primarily economic sanctions – were employed by Washington in recent years against the Russian Federation, the People’s Republic of China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Turkey and Venezuela. Over the decades the U.S. intelligence community mastered the economic war tools to provoke bank runs, increased inflation, currency collapse, and shortages of crucial imported products or the combination of the above mentioned things for the purpose of destabilization of targeted economies and regimes. Washington particularly often takes advantage of the dominant position of U.S. dollar in the global economy and its control of the global dollar financial transfers system as a powerful economic weapon. However, the frequent usage of this weapon makes the targeted states inclined to de-dollarize as far as possible and as quickly as possible, which would be unbeneficial to the U.S. eventually.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Wojna handlowa USA–ChRL i jej konsekwencje
    (Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2020) Żukrowska, Katarzyna
    Signals of coming trade war between USA and China could be seen in slogans stated in the presidential campaign in 2017. In 2018 the US administration guided by president Donald Trump moved from slogans to action concerning protection moves in trade policy. Escalation in application of customs tariff s by the USA in imports of goods from China provoked retorsions from side of the Chinese market. Finally USA and China had signed fi rst trade agreement reducing part of the tensions caused by the trade confl ict. The trade war and signed agreement play specifi c role analysed in a wider context of accompanying conditions, which cover slowing down rates of growth in the world economy. US-China trade war cannot be perceived as a bilateral confl ict, as it has wider context which is resulting from breaking (disturbing) global value chains (GVC). Conducted in the study analysis shows, that the new agreement signed between US and China is a fi rst and very cautious move towards normalization of mutual relations. It can lead towards some wider agreements concerning mutual trade between the two markets. It is assumed that the current confl ict will result in deep changes in production patterns in Asian markets, those highly developed and those developing. The US-China agreement, if it’s conditions are to be fulfi lled can have a strong impact on improvement of the current account of the USA. Improvement of the US current account can be achieved in cost of other Chinese trade partners.