Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "Academic misconduct"

Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Exam Cheating Then and Now: A Comparison of Academic Dishonesty in the World’s Oldest Testing System and Present-day Academia
    (Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II, 2024) Sendur, Agnieszka M.
    In recent years, cheating in exams has been reported to be a serious issue in many countries. Some believe the problem to be more severe, due to the development of modern technologies. But academic dishonesty is not a new phenomenon. This article is going to look into the cheating methods used in the world’s first examination system in Imperial China and the means devised to prevent these malpractices. These are compared with examples of exam cheating observed in contemporary societies and the measures that institutions take to safeguard test and certificate validity. Cheating practices in Imperial exams are described on the basis of the available literature and the preserved artefacts. The state of the problem of cheating by contemporary students has been assembled, based on research articles. Despite all the changes that have occurred in educational systems over the years, cheating methods have not in essence changed significantly.
  • Miniatura
    Pozycja
    Remote Invigilation
    (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2025-08) Sendur, Agnieszka
    The rapid growth of online education has necessitated innovative approaches to ensure academic integrity. Remote invigilation (RI), also known as online proctoring, has emerged as a critical tool in this endeavour. Encompassing a spectrum of methods—live monitoring by human proctors, recorded exams for later review and automated systems powered by artificial intelligence (AI), and hybrid approaches—RI strives to replicate the controlled environment of traditional exams in a digital space. This, in turn, aims to deter cheating and safeguard the validity of online assessments. This entry explores the different types of RI and the stages involved in the remote proctoring process. While RI offers undeniable benefits, facilitating flexible assessment practices and deterring dishonest behaviour, concerns remain regarding student privacy, potential test anxiety due to constant monitoring, and potential bias within AI-powered systems. By examining RI’s advantages and disadvantages, this entry fosters a discussion about its appropriate and ethical implementation within the online assessment landscape.