Przeglądaj wg Słowo kluczowe "podejmowanie decyzji merytorycznych"
Teraz wyświetlane 1 - 2 z 2
Wyników na stronę
Opcje sortowania
Pozycja Studia Prawnicze. Rozprawy i Materiały nr 2 (25), 2019(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2019) Krawiec, Grzegorz; Bałos, Iga; Partyk, Aleksandra; Szpyt, Kamil; Więzowska-Czepiel, Beata; Czochra, Marzena; Bar, Damian; Urbanik, Grzegorz; Klimek, Paweł; Kinecka, Lucyna; Laskowski, Rafał; Ingram, ArturPozycja Sztuczna inteligencja w arbitrażu – wsparcie dla arbitrów w procesie podejmowania decyzji(Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2019) Więzowska-Czepiel, BeataThe article is the first one in a series of two studies analyzing the use of artificial intelligence in the arbitral decision-making process in the light of applicable legal regulations. In terms of the use of AI in arbitral decision-making process, two possibilities can be distinguished: supporting arbitrator by artificial intelligence and replacement of human by artificial intelligence. The paper deals with the first one of these issues. The Polish legal order does not contain provisions that would directly specify the scope of tasks that can be delegated to other persons or technologies. Certain restrictions in this respect are set forth in the provisions on setting aside an arbitral award. Article 1206 § 1 of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure lists among grounds for setting aside an award the circumstances of depriving a party of the possibility of defending his rights in proceedings before an arbitral tribunal and failure to comply with the requirements regarding the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the basic principles of proceedings before that court, arising from the Act or determined by parties (Article 1206 § 1 points 2 and 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure).