Funkcje i dysfunkcje parametryzacji, modułów kształcenia i punktów za publikacje
| dc.contributor.author | Kubiak, Hieronim | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-04T12:29:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-06-04T12:29:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.description.abstract | As a result of the transformations of the higher education system, there began a search for objective measures, making it possible to compare different higher education institutions (in terms of their academic staff, research outcomes documented in publications, professional careers of university graduates and the like). It prompted the academic circles to refl ect on the actions undertaken by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, in particular those pertaining to the National Qualifi cation Framework. Academic disciplines differ from one another in terms of their research methods, which is why all attempts at a parametrization, implementation of quantitative indices to evaluate representatives of the humanities, mathematical algorithms or taxonomy as means enabling a “fair” assessment of all academic teachers regardless of the discipline they represent, appear to be worthless. | pl |
| dc.identifier.citation | Państwo i Społeczeństwo 2014, nr 4, s. 159-172. | pl |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1643-8299 | pl |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11315/25009 | |
| dc.language.iso | pl | pl |
| dc.publisher | Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM | pl |
| dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
| dc.subject | higher education | pl |
| dc.subject | National Qualification Framework | pl |
| dc.subject | humanities | pl |
| dc.subject.other | Administracja | pl |
| dc.subject.other | Edukacja | pl |
| dc.subject.other | Prawo | pl |
| dc.title | Funkcje i dysfunkcje parametryzacji, modułów kształcenia i punktów za publikacje | pl |
| dc.type | Artykuł |